<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.1.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>antropologi.info - anthropology in the news blog - Latest Comments on Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=3383" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-UK</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.1.4"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> urban [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>urban [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2756@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>Unfortunately, too many anthropologists are writing in a language that is increasingly laden with jargon. Your average thesis/journal article is hardly compelling: often, the language seems deliberately obscure. A good question to ask: would our work be intelligible/interesting to those whom we write about? A glance at your average journal article should provide the answer. So long as anths. remain afraid of language, as a sort of post-modern hangover, we&#039;ll never have the chops to tell our stories well. I&#039;m pleasantly surprised to see &#039;anthropology&#039; and &#039;truth&#039; appear in the same sentence in these comments; thought it was officially a dirty word in the social sciences. This goes a long way towards explaining the failure of many to cross-over: journalists are masters of the vernacular, anthropologists distrust it. But it&#039;s the language in which most people think, read and enjoy their stories.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unfortunately, too many anthropologists are writing in a language that is increasingly laden with jargon. Your average thesis/journal article is hardly compelling: often, the language seems deliberately obscure. A good question to ask: would our work be intelligible/interesting to those whom we write about? A glance at your average journal article should provide the answer. So long as anths. remain afraid of language, as a sort of post-modern hangover, we'll never have the chops to tell our stories well. I'm pleasantly surprised to see 'anthropology' and 'truth' appear in the same sentence in these comments; thought it was officially a dirty word in the social sciences. This goes a long way towards explaining the failure of many to cross-over: journalists are masters of the vernacular, anthropologists distrust it. But it's the language in which most people think, read and enjoy their stories.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2756</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lorenz [Member] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lorenz [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2575@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>Thanks a lot for many good points. This seems to be a topic that engages more than I thought. I&#039;ll keep an eye on it</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for many good points. This seems to be a topic that engages more than I thought. I'll keep an eye on it]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2575</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Max Martin [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Max Martin [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2569@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>I think it is an interesting idea. I am a journalist who did a masters in forced migration with a focus on social anthropology mid-career. While I find a lot of common areas of interest and practice, I find lateral entry or even sharing often difficult. I think media houses should invite anthropoligists for assignments and for short or long stints. Similarly journalists, I think will be happy to take time off on an anthropoligical project. Both groups can share notes - about deadlines, spending quality time, respecting the subjects and commercial pressures of the &#039;real&#039; world.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it is an interesting idea. I am a journalist who did a masters in forced migration with a focus on social anthropology mid-career. While I find a lot of common areas of interest and practice, I find lateral entry or even sharing often difficult. I think media houses should invite anthropoligists for assignments and for short or long stints. Similarly journalists, I think will be happy to take time off on an anthropoligical project. Both groups can share notes - about deadlines, spending quality time, respecting the subjects and commercial pressures of the 'real' world.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2569</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> mcgooley [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mcgooley [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2560@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>Not sure if anthropology and journalism are as distinct on the issue of responsibility as described here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#8220;&amp;#8230;anthropologists would agree that our first responsibility is to our collaborators and participants (aka, &amp;#8220;informants&amp;#8221;), whereas journalists are responsible to the public (i.e., media as the &amp;#8220;4th Estate&amp;#8221; of a functioning democracy).&amp;#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That sounds like anthropology is advocacy and journalism isn&amp;#8217;t. Good anthropology acts in the name of truth as does good journalism. In seeking truth, someone can get hurt. But they win in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not sure if anthropology and journalism are as distinct on the issue of responsibility as described here.<br />
<br />
&#8220;&#8230;anthropologists would agree that our first responsibility is to our collaborators and participants (aka, &#8220;informants&#8221;), whereas journalists are responsible to the public (i.e., media as the &#8220;4th Estate&#8221; of a functioning democracy).&#8221;<br />
<br />
That sounds like anthropology is advocacy and journalism isn&#8217;t. Good anthropology acts in the name of truth as does good journalism. In seeking truth, someone can get hurt. But they win in the end.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2560</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Cat [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Cat [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2551@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>Thank you for posting this very timely and thought-provoking article. The lack of anthropologists in the public sphere has been a major source of frustration to me since I was an undergraduate. While I am very much in favor of anthropologists doing journalistic work, I do wonder, however, about the question of where each discipline&#039;s responsibilities lie. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most anthropologists would agree that our first responsibility is to our collaborators and participants (aka, &quot;informants&quot;), whereas journalists are responsible to the public (i.e., media as the &quot;4th Estate&quot; of a functioning democracy). For example, journalists may ethically employ &quot;undercover&quot; techniques to acquire information, but most anthropologists would feel deeply uncomfortable with the idea. Journalists can justify deceiving their informants because their responsbility is to their reader/viewership, while anthropologists cannot really defend deceiving an informant because it would be a betrayal of the informant&#039;s trust. - Not to mention the (often ridiculous) standards and limitations imposed on anthropologists by Human Subjects Review Boards. Even the issue of &quot;informed consent&quot; is a hurdle over which all anthropologists must jump, whereas journalists have much more free reign over what (and whom) they cover.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are, of course, many, many cases where the ethical standards of journalists and anthropologists are completely in sync, but until we hash out this and other ethical questions, I think that anthropologists will continue to be uncomfortable with being associated with journalism. </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank you for posting this very timely and thought-provoking article. The lack of anthropologists in the public sphere has been a major source of frustration to me since I was an undergraduate. While I am very much in favor of anthropologists doing journalistic work, I do wonder, however, about the question of where each discipline's responsibilities lie. <br />
<br />
Most anthropologists would agree that our first responsibility is to our collaborators and participants (aka, "informants"), whereas journalists are responsible to the public (i.e., media as the "4th Estate" of a functioning democracy). For example, journalists may ethically employ "undercover" techniques to acquire information, but most anthropologists would feel deeply uncomfortable with the idea. Journalists can justify deceiving their informants because their responsbility is to their reader/viewership, while anthropologists cannot really defend deceiving an informant because it would be a betrayal of the informant's trust. - Not to mention the (often ridiculous) standards and limitations imposed on anthropologists by Human Subjects Review Boards. Even the issue of "informed consent" is a hurdle over which all anthropologists must jump, whereas journalists have much more free reign over what (and whom) they cover.  <br />
<br />
There are, of course, many, many cases where the ethical standards of journalists and anthropologists are completely in sync, but until we hash out this and other ethical questions, I think that anthropologists will continue to be uncomfortable with being associated with journalism. ]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2551</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Dani [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dani [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2550@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>I actually am getting my degrees in anthropology and journalism for that very reason.  Good to know someone out there backs me up!</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I actually am getting my degrees in anthropology and journalism for that very reason.  Good to know someone out there backs me up!]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2550</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> josep [Visitor] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>josep [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2536@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>i think the idea is not quite well focused. An anthropologist is not a journalist and viceversa. I studied journalism, but don&#039;t practice. i have been always interested in anthropology but didn&#039;t study it. If anthropologists think journalism gives more chances for jobs, in the end, they won&#039;t be either a journalist or an anthropogist. Sure, there are ground for collaboration, but you are thinking to a kind of journalism that seems not to exist nowadays. Interestingly, there are no serious studies about journalism as an anthropology subject. If you engaged in it, please tell me, I have been looking for it for some years and i would be very glad to know about results.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[i think the idea is not quite well focused. An anthropologist is not a journalist and viceversa. I studied journalism, but don't practice. i have been always interested in anthropology but didn't study it. If anthropologists think journalism gives more chances for jobs, in the end, they won't be either a journalist or an anthropogist. Sure, there are ground for collaboration, but you are thinking to a kind of journalism that seems not to exist nowadays. Interestingly, there are no serious studies about journalism as an anthropology subject. If you engaged in it, please tell me, I have been looking for it for some years and i would be very glad to know about results.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2536</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lorenz [Member] in response to: Why anthropologists should become journalists</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lorenz [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c2528@http://www.antropologi.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>@Sara, Yes, you&#039;re right. Many anthropoogists lack the skills. I think that&#039;s why  Brian McKenna suggests courses in Anthropology and Journalism. Your method is a good alternative such courses. There is actually not sooo much to learn. Journalistic writing isn&#039;t something you have to study in the same way as anthropology. You can learn most of the important things on your own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Max: Concerning organisational hurdel and start up funds, why not collaborate with journalism institutes. At the University of Basel in Switzerland I visited several courses in journalistic writing, those courses were open and free for all students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Red: Yes, that&#039;s also one of my problems. Especially now. Media are getting more and more commercialised. But there are other trends as well. Here in Norway, people are getting more and more interested in the rather small number of quality newspapers while the commercial tabloid press is losing their readership. So there is hope! And why not starting your own magazine? &lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Sara, Yes, you're right. Many anthropoogists lack the skills. I think that's why  Brian McKenna suggests courses in Anthropology and Journalism. Your method is a good alternative such courses. There is actually not sooo much to learn. Journalistic writing isn't something you have to study in the same way as anthropology. You can learn most of the important things on your own.<br />
<br />
@Max: Concerning organisational hurdel and start up funds, why not collaborate with journalism institutes. At the University of Basel in Switzerland I visited several courses in journalistic writing, those courses were open and free for all students.<br />
<br />
@Red: Yes, that's also one of my problems. Especially now. Media are getting more and more commercialised. But there are other trends as well. Here in Norway, people are getting more and more interested in the rather small number of quality newspapers while the commercial tabloid press is losing their readership. So there is hope! And why not starting your own magazine? <br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2009/why_anthropologists_should_become_journa#c2528</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
