antropologi.info - anthropology in the news blog

    Nordisk | Auf Deutsch | Anthropology Newspaper | Anthropology Journal Ticker | Journals | Contact

"Germans stick to the ethnic definition more than any other European nation"

by lorenz on Jun 6, 2006 in Us and Them, Europe, migration

Germany's real problem isn't "honor" killers or skinheads. Instead, what keeps this increasingly diverse nation from gaining a strong sense of social cohesion is its self-made confusion over what it means to be German in the first place, Gregory Rodriguez writes in a great article in the Los Angeles Times.

He quotes Barbara John, professor of European anthropology at Humboldt University in Berlin, who says: "We stick to the ethnic definition probably more than any other European nation." He writes:

Indeed, long before Germany's terrible experiment with ethnic supremacy during the Nazi years, Germans had a narrow view of themselves as a people. Unlike, say, the French, who acknowledge that their culture and language derive from the Romans and that they are akin to other Latin peoples, the Germans see themselves as unique.

What he (and many others as well) wonder about: Have the Germans learned from the nazi-period and World war II?:

Even after World War II, when West Germans did everything in their power to rid their culture of chauvinism and racism, they left intact a citizenship law that was based on blood kinship rather than on place of birth. That meant that the children of Turkish guest workers, born in Germany, were not automatic citizens, yet an ethnic German from Romania whose family had never resided in contemporary Germany was.

(...)

It wasn't until 2000 that a more open citizenship law took effect. In arguing for a territory-based notion of citizenship, then-Interior Minister Otto Schily proclaimed that Germany needed to rise above "the destructive principle of ethnocracy."

Six years on, Germans are only beginning to differentiate between their ethnic and civic identities. Ethnic Germans still tend to look on non-ethnic Germans as auslander, or foreigners. Even the media, when they acknowledge minorities as German citizens, use tortured phrases, describing someone as a "Turk who carries a German passport," for example. Not surprisingly, such marginalization has negative consequences.

Rodriguez believes that the shaping of Germany's future identity lies in popular culture. He mentions a popular sitcom "Turkish for Beginners," and Turkish-German novelist Feridun Zaimoglu who says:

"The truth is you can't talk anymore of a foreign population and a native population, as if they were enemies. As I understand myself, I am a German," Zaimoglu says. "I love my country, but I don't make a Wagner opera out of it. I don't try to define what it means to be German. I just live it."

>> read the whole article in the Los Angeles Times (link updated 14.10.2019)

SEE ALSO:

For Turks, Germany is home

French versus Germanic national identity

What’s all this fuss about national identity?

What's a German? The Search for Identity Continues

Germany Survival Bible - a cultural guide for visitors by Spiegel Online

This entry was posted by admin and filed under Us and Them, Europe, migration.
  • « The Kampala Project on Global Citizenship
  • New Journal: "Anthropology of the Middle East" »

8 comments

Comment from: orange.

orange.

“The truth is you can’t talk anymore of a foreign population and a native population, as if they were enemies. As I understand myself, I am a German,” Zaimoglu says.

This is interesting and exceptional, according to my experience with second (or third) generation migrants in germany: Most of the people I ve talked to prefer to perform the non-german part of their identity calling themselves Türken, Griechen, Brasilianer, Polen and so on, while they ve been born in germany, grwe up in germany and often have one parent being german.
btw, I notice the identity issue keeps you going. :-)
Havent forgot to email you and will do. Am overoccupied with running classes and connect to the net only sporadicly these days.

2006-06-08 @ 13:27

Comment from: orange.

orange.

“Have the Germans learned from the nazi-period and World war II?”

From my view the point here still is the Assimilation vs. Integration issue, with all its historical implications. But our dissociating Umgang with history (which creates distance) makes it nearly impossible to conceptualize our national identity anew.

2006-06-08 @ 13:44

Comment from: lorenz

admin

btw, I notice the identity issue keeps you going

Well, being an immigrant myself (as a German citizen in Norway with an Arabic surname), you are faced with these issues all the time. That’s why most immigrant or minority journalists mainly write about minority issues - although they rather would write about cloths, cars or environmental issues. Reading the news here is quite frustrating. Norwegian immigration policy is quite racist - even with the new socialdemocrat-socialist government. But it might be even worse in Germany.

2006-06-08 @ 21:48

Comment from: orange.

orange.

I meant the german identity issue. But also that is no wonder in nonindiviudual regards because media currently covers it more than usual, or is this just my subjective perpception ? The Fußball WM is the trigger with the latest Leitkulturdebatte (Muslimtest etc.) as background–my suggestion.

2006-06-09 @ 00:56

Comment from: lorenz

admin

I don’t know, I don’t read German newspapers regularily, but it seems to yes - at least in German media. Here in Norway the focus is more on nazism and no-go-areas. Anyway it’s quite exotic for me to follow these German identity debates from the outside.

2006-06-09 @ 01:12

Comment from: bloggnjus

bloggnjus

“that they are akin to other Latin peoples, the Germans see themselves as unique”
Sorry this is rubbish germans are not latin because german is not a roman language. Latin is respected very much but german is closer to russian, polish or scandinavian. Germans were the first to find out the indogerman root of their own (and of course other european) tongues. Germans are culturally similar mostly to austrians also to czech (look at the staticstics for beer consume). It is mostly a result of the cold war area (and of WWII of course) that germans could not find their place in europe.

“a ‘Turk who carries a German passport,’ for example. Not surprisingly, such marginalization has negative consequences.”
So americans have never accepted black people as their own as they still refer to them as african-americans. Well thats a shame of the americans (I’ve never heard the term anglo-american refering to a white)

I know many guestworkers that will not take a german passport. i think its their very right not to do this, maybe getting german citizenship isn’t easy, but i’ven erver ever seen a guestworker that wanted to become german as fast as possible (except for some russians). But as we can see those days most immigrants (even in the 2. generation) rather carry a turkish flag and support the turkish soccer team. I think it’s their very right, and i have no problem with it. They feel turkish and they want to be turkish.

2006-06-13 @ 21:39

Comment from: orange.

orange.

“I think it’s their very right, and i have no problem with it. They feel turkish and they want to be turkish.”

yeah but the point is, why do people of turkish descent born in germany and grown up in germany, speaking german fluently, carrying a german passport do distinguish themselves from germany? I d point to othering processes. The thing is not so much changing migrants self-perception but the one of “german-germans” towards a more plural understanding of “germany". “German” for example does not mean “muslim” for many “german-germans” and this simply is a) wrong regarding contemporary facts and b) dangerous, as it implies a heavy destructive potential.

2006-06-17 @ 19:33

Comment from: dan

dan

I would like to comment on the “African-American” comment left by an earlier visitor. This is simply NOT true. “African-American” is a term black Americans created for themselves. It is generally considered politically incorrect to call someone a “black American” (unless that person herself is black). They have wished to be called or called themselves other names at different times (Negroes; people of color; et al.) If you look at the earlier part of the 20th century, there were those who called themselves “Irish-Americans” and such. A US president in that era said he wished that immigrants would no longer be called such names; for they were ALL “Americans” (and that’s it).

2007-04-05 @ 09:11


Form is loading...

Search

Recent blog posts

  • antropologi.info is 20 years old - some (unfinished) notes and thoughts
  • More dangerous research: Anthropologist detained, beaten, forcibly disappeared in Egypt
  • When research becomes dangerous: Anthropologist facing jail smuggles himself out over snowy mountains
  • In Europe, more than two thirds of all academic anthropologists are living in precarity
  • Globalisation and climate change in the High Arctic: Fieldwork in Svalbard, the fastest-heating place on earth

Recent comments

  • mace on Hmong: An Endangered People
  • Joe Patterson on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • lorenz on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • Chris Healy on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • lorenz on Businesses, advertising firms turn to commercial ethnography

Categories

  • All

Retain only results that match:

XML Feeds

  • RSS 2.0: Posts, Comments
  • Atom: Posts, Comments
What is RSS?

User tools

  • Admin

©2025 by Lorenz Khazaleh • Contact • Help • Social CMS software