antropologi.info - anthropology in the news blog

    Nordisk | Auf Deutsch | Anthropology Newspaper | Anthropology Journal Ticker | Journals | Contact

Plans to study anthropological online communities and Open Access movement

by lorenz on Feb 26, 2008 in technology, Open Access Anthropology and Knowledge Sharing, fieldwork / methods, cyberanthropology, University / Academia, internet, websites

Anthropology of anthropology: How do anthropologists form online communities? How are open access publishing and other developments that have sprung up online changing community boundaries? Soon, an anthropologist will do fieldwork among us online anthropologists. http://nodivide.wordpress.com/ is the address of the blog by anthropologist Owen Wiltshire, grad student at Concordia University, Montreal, where he writes:

I am interested in collaborative research methods, and the growth of anthropology online. (…) I’m particularly interested in open-access journals, and feel that opening up academic publishing is an enormously important step for anthropology.

(…)

Delving into the interesting colonial history of anthropology, and into discussions of globalization and neoliberal economic injustice, it’s pretty easy to see how it makes sense to make anthropological work freely available to the world that it studies.

In this way I’ll be exploring ways to study online communities - in this case communities of anthropologists. Its an exciting time for anthropology online. I’ve been following anthropology blogs for a year now, and its amazing how fast its growing. Its quite inspiring, and I think reflects a very vibrant community thats just itching to work (and fight) with each other!

So while my research proposal is extremely vague, and I’ve been made aware of this, I’m absolutely confident that the internet, blogs, and the desire to liberate anthropological knowledge from the world economy are fueling a change in anthropology, and that within this excitement I’ll find an interesting “field” of study.

In an email to me he tells that he’ll be handing in a proposal in April and hopefully be doing fieldwork over the summer. He has already been investigating the ways faculty at Concordia University use the internet in classroom, and is working on getting access to an anthropological journal to investigate the publishing world “face to face".

Owen Wiltshire worked as a web developer for a number of years prior to studying anthropology: “I’ve always followed developments in open source - so I’m excited to see how similar developments work their way into academic culture", he writes.

>> visit Owen Wiltshire’s blog “Just another anthro blog”

SEE ALSO:

Interview with Michael Wesch: How collaborative technologies change scholarship

antropologi.info survey: Six anthropologists on Anthropology and Internet

This entry was posted by admin and filed under technology, Open Access Anthropology and Knowledge Sharing, fieldwork / methods, cyberanthropology, University / Academia, internet, websites.
  • « "Visual Anthropology of Japan" and more new blogs
  • “Focalizar o que é comum aos seres humanos” / Open Access Anthropology in Brasil »

4 comments

Comment from: Sarapen

Sarapen

As someone who is tangentially involved in the open clique of social Internet researchers and who does a middling impression of an actual anthropologist, I though I’d share some thoughts here. First, it’s possible that focusing solely on online anthropologists perhaps narrows the scope of this proposal too much, though I’m sure the same has been said by people at Concordia already. Is Internet Studies a name for this field yet? Anyway, whatever you call their area of study, researchers of social stuff online read each other’s stuff and interact to a regular extent, such that sometimes it’s easy to forget who’s in what discipline, and sometimes a given researcher doesn’t even have a disciplinary home per se (and bear in mind that I’m obviously only talking about the English Internet).

The amount and type of collaboration would also obviously depend on the method of communication. LiveJournal is particularly conducive towards forming communities, moreso than just individual blogs, and using it was extremely helpful when I was looking for theory stuff related to my M.A. research on blogs as sites of diasporic identity construction among Filipinos online. It was much more useful in that regard than my research blog, which I’d thought would have a lot more collaboration with other social Internet researchers.

I would also like to mention that being an online researcher also carries the possibility that one might encounter the very people one is writing about. I remember mentioning danah boyd on I think the lj_research community and having her reply herself.

Finally, there’s another way that online communities can be used to collaborate in research: the online dissemination of digital articles among researchers. I think this practice might actually be illegal since the participants avoid paying for access to journal articles that neither they nor their institutions have subscriptions to, but now that I think about it I’m not actually sure if it’s any more illegal than photocopying an article. Still, this online exchange certainly benefits the people involved and it’s a tangible way in which online researchers can create communitas with each other. Sure, researchers email article PDFs to each other, but I’m thinking more of dedicated online communities set up just for exchanging PDFs. I know of at least one such community and suspect that Firefox extensions such as AllPeers are already being used to facilitate this exchange as well.

Anyway, this project sounds interesting, so I think I’ll be paying attention over the next little while.

2008-02-27 @ 05:47

Comment from: Maximilian Forte

Maximilian Forte

In response to part of the previous comment–"First, it’s possible that focusing solely on online anthropologists perhaps narrows the scope of this proposal too much, though I’m sure the same has been said by people at Concordia already"–I have to disagree. Most online anthropologists who collaborate do in fact make a point of identifying themselves as anthropologists, and unless the person is using a pseudonym, or has buried details of their CV, it is a fairly simple matter to discover the person’s disciplinary background or current affiliation. In the case of anthropology blogs, often the very word “anthropology” is in the title of the blog, or in its description. If the suggestion was to expand the project to include collaboration between anthropologists, online and offline, then of course that is not practical.

The more important point is that a project must have clearly defined limits. It cannot be open-ended, and certainly not for the relatively brief period of a Masters program. If one were to look at all all online collaboration between social scientists, regardless of discipline, then the project would no longer be feasible given the time constraints. I think most of my colleagues would agree and would in fact offer the same advice.

2008-02-27 @ 17:07

Comment from: Owen Wiltshire

Owen Wiltshire

Thank you all for this amazing input. Within a day of this blog “shout-out” I have been contacted by three parties who are interested in sharing ideas about how to go about this research. I am blown away.

Thanks Lorenz for the publicity.

Sarapen, thanks for the comments! The difficulty teachers have in distributing anthropological works to students and to each other [ie: my $300 book / article budget each semester] is definately a problem. It certainly backs up the community desire/need for open access. I’ll also investigate the academic communities you mentioned above.

I am very encouraged by the community response and am sure that the internet makes it easier than any previous period in history to find similarly interested people.

I also think this reflects how the academic community can play a helpful and necessary role during the research process itself. It’s open access, and open management.

Sincerely,
Owen Wiltshire.

2008-02-27 @ 21:20

Comment from: Delia Dumitrica

Delia Dumitrica

I’d recommend an intriguing yet easy book on virtual worlds - Ludlow & Wallace’s 2007 book “Second Life Herald: The Tabloid that Witnessed the Dawn of the Metaverse” (and I’ve blogged about it here).

There is a lot of ethnographic work on online communities, in both anthropology and communication/ internet studies. The AOIR list and facebook group is a good place to start.

Collaborative ethnographies - or autoethnographies - of online communities seem harder to find (any suggestions would be appreciated), yet would seem to suit the individualized path we take on the internet much better.

2008-03-05 @ 16:52


Form is loading...

Search

Recent blog posts

  • antropologi.info is 20 years old - some (unfinished) notes and thoughts
  • More dangerous research: Anthropologist detained, beaten, forcibly disappeared in Egypt
  • When research becomes dangerous: Anthropologist facing jail smuggles himself out over snowy mountains
  • In Europe, more than two thirds of all academic anthropologists are living in precarity
  • Globalisation and climate change in the High Arctic: Fieldwork in Svalbard, the fastest-heating place on earth

Recent comments

  • mace on Hmong: An Endangered People
  • Joe Patterson on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • lorenz on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • Chris Healy on Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of "stone age" and "primitive"
  • lorenz on Businesses, advertising firms turn to commercial ethnography

Categories

  • All

Retain only results that match:

XML Feeds

  • RSS 2.0: Posts, Comments
  • Atom: Posts, Comments
What is RSS?

User tools

  • Admin

©2025 by Lorenz Khazaleh • Contact • Help • Responsive CMS